On October 18th, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), also known as the Iran nuclear deal, reached its "Termination Day," a date that has led to conflicting interpretations regarding the status of United Nations Security Council (UNSC) Resolution 2231. Reports indicate that while one segment of the global community believes the resolution has expired, another segment asserts that the "snapback" of sanctions has taken effect, creating a "split reality." This divergence stems from actions taken by multiple member states, including the US, France, UK, Russia, and China, who have reportedly violated unanimously approved UNSC resolutions related to the deal. This "Termination Day" marks a significant point for the JCPOA, with varying perspectives on its implications for international sanctions and agreements. The conflicting views highlight a breakdown in consensus concerning the resolution's lifespan and the enforceability of its provisions. The situation has been described as a "record for a nuclear deal" by observers. The ambiguity surrounding UNSC Resolution 2231 on this critical date underscores the complex diplomatic landscape concerning Iran's nuclear program. Different interpretations by key global actors contribute to the uncertainty regarding the future of the JCPOA and its associated international legal frameworks.
